Check out my FlickR pics!

Today is Super Tuesday, and no… I didn’t vote

By sovknight | February 5, 2008

presidentialseal It’s not that I have anything against voting, or that I’m unpatriotic, or that I’m against democracy in any way.  There are two main reasons why I didn’t vote in the primary election today:

  1. I’m not registered to vote in the state of Utah.
  2. I simply don’t like any of the candidates

Now, I know I’m going to catch a lot of flack over what I’m about to say.  Believe me, I’ve heard it all a million times and I’m sure I’ll hear it a million more.  Even some of my best friends have had this particular debate with me, so if you feel so compelled, have at it if you will.

I haven’t voted in a presidential election since 1992.  That’s sixteen years.  Why?  Am I some sort of communist?  Do I hate the democratic process?  Should I move to Canada?  Well, the short answer is that I’m basically lazy.  Beyond that, I guess the biggest reason is that I simply don’t put it very high on my priority list to think about who becomes the next president.  To me, and in my experience, they’re all more or less the same.  Sure, they have different agendas and true, they all go about things in different ways.  What I mean to say is, they’re all politicians, and for me that means that whatever they say or whatever they pretend to stand for is irrelevant.  They’re going to do what’s in their best interests to get elected, and then forget whatever pledges they made thereafter.

I follow the polls somewhat.  I have a passing interest in who these people are and what they say.  Most, if not all of them, say exactly what they think you want to hear.  I listen to the news and I know the candidate’s platforms for the post part.  I guess it comes down to this:  All I want is for one of them to actually do the things they say they’re going to do.  This is mostly impossible however, as the promises they make aren’t generally within their power to accomplish.  They have some pull, of course, but to accomplish major goals in this country requires large committees and budgets and lots of arguing.  A candidate needs to be able to admit this, and be honest and realistic about their goals.

I don’t like the candidates this year.  Not any of them.  Sure, I could just say “screw it” and pick the lesser of all evils, but that doesn’t get me anywhere.  I’d still have voted for someone I didn’t especially like, and I don’t want that.  I want someone I can get behind.  Someone I can trust to be honest.  Thus far, none of the candidates have shown me that.  I don’t trust any of them.

Some of the things you hear

 

  • “If you don’t vote, then you don’t have any right to complain later.”

Yeah… We’ve all been hearing that one all our lives.  This is based on some sort of guilt trip that people like to bring out to make you feel sorry for not voting.  Here’s what I believe.  It’s backwards.  If you vote for someone, you’ve spoken.  You’ve had your say.  You’re done.  Now you need to back up your candidate.  You need to support the person you voted for, and you no longer have any more objectivity.  No more complaints.  You’ve made your bed and now you need to lie in it.  If your candidate does some good things, then congratulations.  You made a good choice.  If he screws up, then sorry about your luck.  You have no one else to blame but yourself, and you can’t take the decision back.

However, I didn’t vote for him.  I didn’t vote for the other guy, either.  I am impartial.  I can now be objective, and say, “look… you voted for this guy, and look what he’s done.”  I have every right to complain, because of that objectivity.  I haven’t had my say, and I can look at things from all perspectives and point out all the problems as I choose without bias.

  • “You really should vote.  It’s your responsibility as an American.  George Washington and Thomas Jefferson and Paul Revere and Pat Tillman all fought and died for your right to vote!”

No… wrong.  George Washington and Thomas Jefferson and Paul Revere and Pat Tillman all fought and died for my right to CHOOSE.  The freedoms that our Founding Fathers and American patriots fought for are, among many, the right to choose whether I want to vote or not.  It’s not my responsibility, it’s my decision.

  • “If you hate America so much, then move!”

I hate this one.  I’m also confused by it.  I don’t hate democracy.  I don’t hate America or the freedoms we have or the values we stand for.  I’m sorry if you somehow got that impression, but you are mistaken.  This ultra-patriotism you seem to have just around election time doesn’t become you.  I love my country and my freedoms.  I just happen to not like the candidates for president.  I don’t want to vote for any of them.  That doesn’t make me a bad American, or a bad person.  And as much as I like Canada, I don’t want to live there.  It’s cold in Canada, and they have shitty beer.

Traditionally speaking

Traditionally, the president has always been a wealthy, popular white guy.  Always.  Sometimes, he’s also a military figure, a successful lawyer or businessman, a congressman, or some other sort of politician.  He’s always a rich and popular white guy though, so based on that tradition and that tradition alone, not racism or sexism, but purely tradition, we can safely decide who our next president will be.

  • Hillary Clinton.  Rich, white, popular, but not a guy.  Take a seat.
  • Barack Obama.  Rich, popular, is a guy, but is only a little bit white.  Mostly black.  Better luck next time.
  • Mitt Romney.  Rich, white, popular, and a guy.  Perfect right?  Nope.  He’s a Mormon.  So, you ask?  What does religion have to do with it?  Well, it shouldn’t have anything to do with it, but it does.  I live in Utah, where more than half the population is Mormon.  I know lots of them, and I also know lots of people who are voting for Mitt Romney specifically because he’s Mormon.  They may not even know anything about him, other than some vague recollection about him having something to do with the 2002 Olympics, but that doesn’t matter.  They will vote for him because he’s a Mormon.  Likewise, I also know people that will NOT vote for him because he’s a Mormon.  No other reason, just a prejudice against religion or even specifically Mormons, for whatever reason.  Mitt Romney = not gonna win.
  • Mike Huckabee.  Rich, white, is a guy, but not that popular.  At least, not yet.  When compared against the aforementioned candidates, his popularity is behind.  That’s not a good sign.  Plus, he’s got a stupid name.  Can you imagine President Huckabee?  What is this, the Andy Griffith show?  Chances:  Very long.  Maybe, but not likely.
  • Ron Paul.  Rich, white, is a guy, not popular.  Seriously, who is this guy?  I haven’t even seen any campaign signs for him.  I do know exactly two people that support him though, but that’s not enough.  Not a chance.

Well, that pretty much leaves John McClane.

diehard1  Personally, I think John McClane would make a kick-ass president.  We definitely wouldn’t have any more terrorist issues.  Foreign policy would be settled quickly and decisively, and the State of the Union address would be peppered with obscenities and sharp one-liners.  America’s new catchphrase?  “Yippeeki-yay, motherf”… wait, John McCainMcCain, not McClane? 

Bummer.

Well, OK.  John McCain.  Rich, white, is a guy, popular, plus he’s ex-military, a current senator, and he’s old.  Perfect ingredients for a president.  Of course, he’s also an asshole.  Still, traditionally speaking, he’s the guy.  Plus, as I write this, he’s leading his party.   Consensus:  Good.

Final thoughts

The real election isn’t until November of course.  That still leaves plenty of time for the candidates to all show their true colors.  Today it’s being whittled down to two, one for each party.  Tomorrow, all the real mudslinging starts.  Perhaps a candidate will emerge that impresses me.

Maybe I’ll even go and vote.

 

Update:

As of today, February 7, Mitt Romney has “suspended” (dropped out) of the race for Republican candidate.  Pussy.  He was running second to John McCain, but that wasn’t good enough.  He got mad, took his ball, and went home.  What a douche.  What about all those people who voted for him just two days ago?

You ever see that episode of Saturday Night Live where all the Star Trek nerds are at a convention and Captain Kirk shows up and tells them all to “get a life”?  Then all the Trekkie nerds look all dejected and confused?

That’s how I picture all of his supporters right now.  Lots of little Romney followers with their foam Romney hands and their Romney hats and their Romney pins and t-shirts, all sitting in the crowd waiting for their wonderful leader to emerge and tell them to keep fighting the good fight… all the way to the convention and maybe even the White House!  But no, instead, Mitt Romney steps up to the lectern, unbuttons his cufflinks, rolls up his sleeves, and in a quick, decisive movement, extends both middle fingers towards his supporters with a big, shit-eating grin on his face.  Then he leaves, while the crowd looks around in confusion, their Romney swag suddenly feeling heavy and awkward, having lost some of its magic.

Good riddance.  See ya.

 

 

Topics: Thoughts |

6 Responses to “Today is Super Tuesday, and no… I didn’t vote”


  1. Today is Super Tuesday, and no… I didn’t vote Says:
    February 6th, 2008 at 12:35 am

    [...] Ron Paul War Room wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt It’s not that I have anything against voting, or that I’m unpatriotic, or that I’m against democracy in any way. There are two main reasons why I didn’t vote in the primary election today: I’m not registered to vote in the state of Utah. I simply don’t like any of the candidates Now, I know I’m going to catch a lot of flack over what I’m about to say. Believe me, I’ve heard it all a million times and I’m sure I’ll hear it a million more. Even some of my best friends have had this particu [...]

  2. ondiv Says:
    February 6th, 2008 at 8:13 am

    Just letting you know that I read this.
    And while I’m not mad that you didn’t vote, I am disappointed. You are right, the founding fathers fought and died to give you the choice and you made it. However, it isn’t wholly laziness that keeps you from voting (IMO) but that you have given up. You have no hope that a new president can bring about the change that is needed and have just given up.
    I don’t vote because I think it will make a change, I vote because I *hope* it will. I know that my vote counts for diddlysqwat because the president isn’t elected from the popular vote but the uber secret electoral college (where do I sign up for that school!).
    If I really thought my vote counted it would be for Ron Paul. Sure, he’s a little extreme (or a lot), but maybe that’s exactly what this country needs… someone willing to be extreme. (for the record I voted for Obama yesterday because I knew one more republican vote in Utah wasn’t worth anything compared to a democrat vote, and I choose Obama over Clinton)
    We couldn’t be farther from what the founding fathers had envisioned.
    Anyway, don’t let laziness and disillusionment get a hold on you Nic. Have hope and faith that something good is just around the corner. Or just get involved! You don’t like it, change it yourself! And don’t feed me that bullshiite line of “I’m a no body and can’t do anything to change it”. Everyone starts out as a no body and then becomes great by DOING things. Get involved in your local government and make the change you want to see!
    Anyway, I still luv your guts, even if you are a none voting person ;)

  3. Sra Says:
    February 6th, 2008 at 10:50 am

    This was a great post, Sov, I had to really control myself to keep from laughing too much at work. (After all, work is not supposed to be a place of laughter!)

    I love the John McLane thing, btw — perfect!

    Ok, so let me start by saying I totally know where you’re coming from. Growing up, my mother was really involved in the Utah Democrats — she was even one of the Utah delegates for the 1992 democratic convention.

    –BTW, the primary vote doesn’t decide the candidates, it decides how many delegates each candidate gets, and then those delegates all go to the convention, and from the convention, they somehow choose a nominee, who becomes the candidate (I don’t fully get it either.) –

    Ok, so I spent plenty of time helping my mom drop fliers on people’s porches and nail lawn signs together, and after a few years, I was DONE with politics. November was the most loathed time of year for me. Anyway, politics is the second worst thing to talk about if you want to maintain good relations with family and friends. The first is religion.

    Now this is going to sound stupid, but after many many years of shunning politics like the plague, what got me interested in politics was watching The West Wing. Is that the lamest thing or what? But it’s true, and I think it was a great show, so I’m not ashamed. Martin Sheen’s character, President Bartlett, had all the qualities you listed above: white, rich, guy, political background, and also, he sometimes made promises he couldn’t come through on. And I know he was a made up president, but he was a good one. He had his problems, but he was in a way an ideal president — a visionary. Like Lincoln, or FDR.

    That got me excited, just the idea that we could get someone who may not be perfect, but who would approach his (or her!) office with the respect that such a responsibility deserves. Someone who is more concerned about the welfare of the country and its people than of his or her own welfare. Someone who has the charisma necessary to unite this country and bring us back out of the dire position Bush has left us in.

    We need a Lincoln right now, and we are more than due for one. I happen to think that it can’t get much worse than Bush, but that doesn’t mean I want to settle for someone just a step above him.

    You’re right that you can choose not to choose, essentially. I like your interesting take about how it is the voters who have no right to complain, and the objective non-voters who can complain. It’s an interesting position, and there are some good points in it, but I think it’s ignoring the complacency that comes from not choosing, and that, my dear friend, is allowing yourself to be a sheep.

    I can’t fault you for not having interest in politics, as I was once one of those people. Even so I always did still vote, even in Utah where my liberal choices mean diddley. But now I look at my vote differently — it’s me stating my position, even if it isn’t heard and doesn’t win, it’s important for me to have my own voice. It’s kind of the same reason I actually decided to resign from the Mormon church instead of just stopping attending. I was actively stating who I am and what I don’t believe. By voting, I actively state what I want. If you don’t care what you want, then you haven’t looked hard enough, and have allowed yourself to be lulled, or to lose hope. And that, I think, is really sad.

  4. Sovknight Says:
    February 6th, 2008 at 7:18 pm

    One could make the argument, and we can debate this if you like, that this blog IS me stating my position and having my voice. If I go to the polls, and I walk into the booth and vote for a candidate, one vote is recorded. No one else knows, and that candidate isn’t going to know that I voted for them. They aren’t going to know why, and I haven’t said my piece. My one vote is an inaudible whisper in a vast sea of noise.

    However, this blog will potentially be read by hundreds, if not thousands of people. Possible thousands of people who know exactly what my position is. My thoughts CAN be heard. In this day and age, this blog gives me more power than that vote ever will.

  5. Sra Says:
    February 7th, 2008 at 1:36 pm

    I will agree that if this blog gets read by thousands of people, you will have more power here than with your one possibly Blue vote in a forever Red state. (And if you manage to get those thousands of readers, let me know how you did it ;)
    But you do recognize that your position in this issue is a non-position, right? What good does a non-position do, even to a thousand pairs of eyes?

    And having said that, I’d like to reiterate (or is it iterate?) that I’m fine with you not backing someone. After all, Romney has just dropped out of the race, so the really scary candidates are being whittled away. No matter what we’re left with, it will be better than Bush and Dick.

  6. Sovknight Says:
    February 8th, 2008 at 12:48 am

    Better than Bush and Dick. Hehe. There’s a joke there somewhere.

Comments

« Roller coasters: How I love thee | Home | A parting shot in the back »